Search for: "Clara Doe"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,416
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2006, 8:07 am
(Susan Brenner, Brian Carrier & Jef Henninger, The Trojan Horse Defense in Cybercrime Cases, 21 Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal 1 (2004)). [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm
The plaintiffs and appellants wereSavePanocheValley, Santa Clara Audubon Society and the Sierra Club. [read post]
25 May 2018, 9:21 pm
What implications does it have for Cuban politics and the course of reforms? [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
City of Santa Clara (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1150 which upheld the practice of negotiating a term sheet at the outset of project processing. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:35 am
But tougher grading by the bar does not account for the significant drop in the California pass rate in recent years. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
Under CEQA, if the agency’s action is ministerial, CEQA does not apply. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:09 pm
"The problem is, sometimes the dog does eat your homework. [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:56 am
The third proposal, drafted by the ACLU, the Coalition for Police Accountability and the League of Women Voters, does not. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 8:51 pm
"How does it feel to see Bruce get older? [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:41 pm
Just days before, on March 16, 2020, seven Bay Area counties (Contra Costa, Santa Clara, San Mateo, San Francisco, Marin, Alameda and Santa Cruz) and the City of Berkeley each issued orders to ensure that the maximum number of people self-isolate in their places of residence to the maximum extent feasible, while enabling essential services to continue. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:42 pm
While the Act doesn’t expressly authorize granting such injunctions ex parte, neither does it prohibit them. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 5:13 pm
The states (led by California) and the local governments (the city and county of San Francisco and the county of Santa Clara, California) echo a common theme: Arizona and the other Republican-led states have no right to intervene because, as a practical matter, this case does not affect them. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:40 am
Or if it does, it wants to hear it only on the company’s terms. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
Santa Clara Pueblo v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:38 am
The plaintiff has no other employees, and does not make, use or sell the patented subject matter in Tennessee or elsewhere. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:05 pm
To be clear, my article does not posit that retail trading will topple markets. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
Santa Clara Pueblo v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm
The new ETS does not require blanket vaccine-verification of employees or third parties, along the lines of the onerous requirements we have seen in Oregon and Santa Clara. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:05 pm
Matt Dedon is a law clerk at ARC Law Group and a 3L student at Santa Clara University School of Law. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 10:30 pm
And they say the USA does not torture, yeah right. [read post]
