Search for: "Close v. U. S" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:17 pm by Sara Chimene-Weiss, Helen White
By the logic of the Supreme Court’s reigning Second Amendment case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:09 am by Peter Mahler
Schweitzer in JPS Partners v Binn, 2014 NY Slip Op 31204(U) [Sup Ct, NY County May 6, 2014], came at the behest of a 1.93% investor in the parent company, a New York limited liability company known as Binn and Partners, LLC, controlled by its sole managing member, Moreton Binn. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm by Josh Blackman
Kavanaugh's Rahimi concurrence closed the feedback loop. [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:14 am
In this case , Romano v Ficchi , 2009 NY Slip Op 51011(U) , Decided on May 22, 2009 , Supreme Court, Kings County , Rivera, J. plaintiff sought to buy a condo with a view. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 6:24 pm by Peter Mahler
Rosania v Gluck As far as I know, the first case to raise that lurking question post-Raharney is Rosania v Gluck, 2019 NY Slip Op 32087(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 8, 2019], decided earlier this month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 4:20 am by Peter J. Sluka
  A recent decision from New York County, Mavridakis v Litvack, 2024 NY Slip Op. 33971[U], suggests otherwise. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:22 am by Susan Brenner
Upon arriving, the AT&T technician was greeted at the door by [Jurek’s] twenty-something year-old son who invited the technician inside and explained that U–Verse was not properly working.The son took the AT&T technician to a bedroom closet where [Jurek’s] computer and the Internet gateway (the modem for the U–Verse service) were located. [read post]