Search for: "DUKES v. STATE"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
(See CAB entry dated May 4) April 26 – The Ninth Circuit issues its decision in Dukes v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:13 am
(Northside Chiropractic Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:13 am
(Northside Chiropractic Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:59 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in DHS v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:39 am
Posted by Philip Miles, an attorney with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania in the firm's civil litigation and labor and employment law practice groups. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 1:54 pm
The case, Magalhaes v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
Ed. 2d 158 (1968) (per curiam); State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:49 pm
Young, U.S. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
Last February, the United States Supreme Court added another layer to its punitive damages jurisprudence in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:05 am
After Wal-Mart v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:01 am
In Washington v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:40 am
Hodges to that of Texas v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 10:44 am
Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011)), damages evidence that is inconsistent with the plaintiff’s theory of liability (citing Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 4:30 am
Next week the Supreme Court will hear Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 6:51 am
“Shrink wrap” licenses for software are a good example, where opening and using the product is a sufficient indication that the purchaser has accepted the terms of use (see ProCD, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:39 pm
While the Court supports its ruling with over 50 pages of factual findings, its holding was essentially a foregone conclusion once the Court determined that it agreed with the reasoning of VFB LLC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 12:39 pm
Dukes, held that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws prohibiting class action waivers in arbitration in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:35 pm
Windsor, and Ortiz v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
A few weeks later, the Fifth Circuit ruled in Comer v. [read post]
