Search for: "Deal v. State"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 26,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2010, 2:45 pm
The Court does not agree with the prosecution: If Congress were to take up the enterprise of criminalizing "undisclosed self-dealing by a public official or private employee," it would have to employ standards of sufficient definiteness and specificity to overcome due process concerns. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:24 am
Vulcan Materials; dual-class share structures and director accountability; go-shop provisions and deal protection devices; process issues in approving mergers and appropriate remedies; the use of poison pills following Airgas v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:26 pm
State. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:40 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:32 am
S. 420, 425, 427 (1984) (quoting United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
Subway ran a promotion offering deals if customers signed up for text messages. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
Circuit had outlined these “demanding standards” in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:59 am
Leiza DolghihAttorney, Godwin Lewis PC The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals started the new year with a quick civil procedure lesson, ruling yesterday in Vantage Drilling Company v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Alas, the conceptual genie that the philosopher can deploy is not for sale to historians, who have to deal with really existing people inhabiting specific moments and contexts. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 7:45 am
Baker v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am
Later, the Court of Justice of the EU brought a bit more balance into that analysis with its Huawei v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:55 pm
This system, as mentioned before, deals with cases that pertain to national laws and the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:21 pm
We have a special deal for people who came from (then-) Sandinista-controlled Nicaragua. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:48 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:06 am
State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:06 pm
The Austin-based federal Western District Court for Texas found the United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 10:08 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:28 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
