Search for: "Doe v. Google, Inc."
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,983
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
The claim against the first defendant, Google Inc, continues. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
The panel began with a discussion of Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:08 pm
Part 1 – Adrienne Page QC Case Law: OPO v James Rhodes (formerly MLA): Pianist’s book unbanned, no intention to cause distress – Dan Tench Case Law: Mosley v Google Inc, Data Protection claim against Google to go to trial – Lorna Skinner Privacy Issues in New Zealand: Sex with the Office Lights on – Nicole Moreham Case Law: Vidal-Hall v Google, Distress damages can be awarded under s 13 DPA without pecuniary… [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:21 am
by Dennis Crouch The decision in Parus Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
WFAA–TV, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:43 am
* Weinstein v. eBay Inc., 2011 WL 2555861 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:31 pm
This relies on the premise that Doe has deep pockets but his business associate does not.In the course of its investigation, the grand jury subpoenaed Doe's accountant requesting that he provide the Government with Doe's personal and corporate tax returns. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:44 pm
The Court’s rationale was that the aim of Directive 95/46 was “effective and complete protection of the persons concerned” ([28], citing Google Spain, C‑131/12, EU:C:2014:317, [34]) and that the concept of a “controller” does not necessarily refer to a single entity and may concern “several actors taking part in that processing, with each of them then being subject to the applicable data protection provisions”. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 10:05 pm
Project, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:27 am
Pictures, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
* Yahoo Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
Next we enter the exciting world of patent law with Halo Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
In contrast, a recent North Carolina case (Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 2:58 pm
things come in threes, the Paris Tribunal turned to the terms and conditions of Facebook in a decision handed down on 9 April 2019 (decision: Paris Tribunal (Tribunal de Grande Instance), UFC-Que Choisir v Facebook Inc. (9 April 2019), see herefor the decision in French). [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 3:10 pm
Zuckerberg) Formerly Sealed Complaint (U.S. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:32 am
Hearthware, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 am
Court of Appeals’ decisions are binding on this court, the judge went with a test another federal judge adopted in Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
Careful what you consent to: Adwords and ArgosArgos Ltd v Argos Systems Inc [2017] EWHC 231(February 2017)Argos is a well-known UK High Street retailer. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:31 am
John Does 1-10, No. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:15 pm
The most notable instance of such evasion occurred in Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
