Search for: "Does 1 - 20" Results 1101 - 1120 of 28,793
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2014, 4:33 pm by Patricia Salkin
The court found that the Conference’s “course of conduct” theory, as pleaded in its FAC and as clarified in its briefing, does not sufficiently allege a cognizable legal theory for its regulatory takings cause. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:58 am by Dan Harris
This is Part 1 of a two part series of posts by Shannon Brandao*, an international attorney and China expert and the editor of China Boss. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:26 am
July 28, 2014) — offered three main arguments for its position, but I don’t think they are on balance persuasive: 1. [read post]
The employer must provide employees notice of their rights under the ordinance with the first paycheck issued after July 1, 2017. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 6:36 pm
Eaton appeals the Board's anticipation rejection of claim 1 because Jungkeit does not describe a vitamin composition that is essentially free of anti-oxidants and thus cannot anticipate claim 1 [which recites that the composition is "essentially free of anti-oxidants."]. [...] [2] Similarly, Mr. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 6:02 am by Derek T. Muller
At the end, I aggregate them, weighing each 1/3 like USNWR does, to give an overall percentile total. [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
That is what China does not want to see, and the responsibility does not lie with the Chinese side," Zhao said at a daily briefing. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:13 am
The Court held that the “substantial assistance” prong of Section 20(e) does not require the SEC to show proximate causation. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 5:27 am by Minick Law
If the state does not mention any grossly aggravating factors or aggravating factors, then the state clearly has not attempted to prove those beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am by Keith Szeliga and Daniel Alvarado
Determining Reasonableness As provided in the FAR, “[a] cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business. [read post]