Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE" Results 1101 - 1120 of 3,671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
On 4 October 2011 the Court of Justice duly delivered its ruling in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen and C-429/08 Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (see IPKat post here),  following which Mr Justice Kitchin -- having metaphorically vanished as Gandalf… [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:33 am by Ellie Ismaili, Olswang LLP
The Supreme Court disagreed and stated that there were no provisions in the CMR that state that all closely connected claims must be brought under one set of proceedings. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:01 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 553 The Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006, s 67, extinguished all unrecorded rights of way for mechanically propelled vehicles in England as of 2 May 2006. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The cause of action was descended from the first Statute of Westminster adopted in England in 1275, incorporated in New York’s earliest common law, and first codified in this State in a 1787 statute that closely tracks the current provision (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 14-15 [2014]; Amalfitano, 12 NY3d at 12). [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:36 am by Bill Heinze
Cir. 2007), The All England Lawn Tennis Club (Wimbledon) Limited v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:43 am
Langdell was a United States resident and the first and second defendant companies were incorporated in the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
Hamilton Bank and the assertion in state court of an England v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:35 am
More than a dozen such motions were brought on Monday in Boston’s federal jury trial of United States vs. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:09 am by INFORRM
Tugendhat J refused to make such a determination (Cairns v Modi [2010] EWHC 2859 (QB)). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm by Bexis
United States, 1990 WL 124496, at *3 (9th Cir. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm by Frank Cranmer
Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156 considered the constitutionality of the prohibition under Queensland’s Weapons Act 1990 on bringing a kirpan into a school. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 2:26 pm by Steve Gottlieb
And the closing words of Article V read that “no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]