Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 6,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am
He is a research associate at the CCP Research Foundation and also works as international counsel in an English law firm. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 1:37 am
Historically, the English courts have policed the parameters of the “same interest” test strictly: Emerald Supplies Ltd v British Airways Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 1284. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:04 am
State (Maryland). [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:14 pm
Defendant struck Alvarez in the jaw although Alvarez, who did not speak English, had not exchanged any words with him. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:30 am
Stage 1: Entitled Expectation Lord Tyre considered the leading authorities on the issue of “defect” under the CPA, namely Wilkes v DePuy International Limited [2016] EWHC 3096 (QB) and Gee and Ors v DePuy International Limited [2018] EWHC 1208 (QB). [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am
Youming Jin v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
The sale of offices-as-property may seem strange and even corrupt to modern readers, but it was a long-lasting and practical foundation for the nation-state, modern administration, and colonial expansion.Whereas vénalité had grown out of control in revolutionary-era France, the English had a more stable system of freehold property rights, a distinctive English protection of the officeholders’ investment against “despotic”… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:14 am
In Jindal Exports Ltd v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:54 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm
The OPQ case provides one possible “way out” of this unsatisfactory state of affairs. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:57 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Secondly, how must the claimant know what he has to know – that is, what state of mind, assessed subjectively or objectively or by a mixture of the two, amounts to knowledge for this purpose (“the how? [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Secondly, how must the claimant know what he has to know – that is, what state of mind, assessed subjectively or objectively or by a mixture of the two, amounts to knowledge for this purpose (“the how? [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
Securities Corp. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 394, 427‒428 (Rosenthal) [defendants omitted portions of the contract when reading it aloud to plaintiff, who could not read English]; Erickson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 9:05 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch] What, no more drop-ins from other states? [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 12:47 pm
In Pabon v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 9:49 am
Ferguson to Brown v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:26 pm
(David Bernstein) As Ilya notes below, the Fifth Circuit has upheld the University of Texas’s racial and ethnic preference practices in Fisher v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 1:35 am
In a two day hearing at the beginning of October, the Supreme Court heard the case of AMT Futures Ltd v Marzillier & Ors focussing on the question of which EU member state has jurisdiction in international tortious claims. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
English, 902 So. 2d 836, 837 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). [read post]
