Search for: "Federal v. Levine"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
., v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 3:37 pm
Levine that will be a big test of federal pre-emption authority. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:18 am
Levine, the more troubling action is taking place out of public view. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 7:03 am
Brooklyn federal Judge Jack Weinstein stops decades of New York personal injury practice dead in its tracks when he tosses out the actuarial life expectancy tables we use because the distinction between black and white life spans is discriminatory and unconstitutional (New York Law Journal via Law.com): "Reliance on 'race'-based statistics in estimating life expectancy of individuals for purposes of calculating damages is not scientifically acceptable in our current… [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 3:02 pm
Levine is argued.The AAJ found that, since 2005, seven federal agencies have issued over 60 proposed or final rules with preemption language in the preamble. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
" Id.Yes, yes: As the November 3 argument date in Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
On November 3, the Supreme Court will review the case Wyeth v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:47 am
Implied preemption will again be rearing its head this year when the US Supreme Court hands down an opinion in Wyeth v Levine. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:54 am
Supreme Court agreed to take the case, Wyeth v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:00 am
Upon reaching a point where the party of the second part (Light Bulb) becomes separated from the party of the third part ("Receptacle"), the party of the first part (Lawyer) shall have the option of disposing of the party of the second part (Light Bulb) in a manner consistent with all applicable state,local and federal statutes.3.) [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Rost v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 6:20 pm
The Levine v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:31 pm
See Farina v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 6:00 am
Levine, No. 06-1294 . [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 4:35 pm
Supreme Court "Federal preemption" case, Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 4:21 pm
Levine, No. 06-1249, in which it continues to insist that it could not comply with both federal prescription drug regulations and any state-based common law duties to warn. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:13 am
Federal Act unless that [is] the clear and manifest purpose of Congress.' " (quoting Rice v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 9:14 pm
The company argues that the state law is pre-empted by a federal law requiring drug labels to be approved by the FDA.The question on which the Supreme Court granted cert in Wyeth v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:15 pm
The Supreme Court's upcoming decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 7:21 pm
Levine case. [read post]
