Search for: "French v. State" Results 1101 - 1120 of 2,938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
Patrick Huston, which “organizes, analyzes and synthesizes all of the 48 UTSA-adopting states’ published court opinions (state and federal). [read post]
5 May 2024, 8:32 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Over to the team to report on Edwards Lifesciences v Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences (UPC_CFI_249/2023:"The Edwards Lifesciences v Meril preliminary injunction (PI) proceedings at the UPC on EP 3 763 331 protecting a “Prosthetic valve crimping device” (see here) started with a bang (or should this UPCKat say, crimp?) [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:57 am by Daphne Keller
Google’s First Amendment claim has a straightforward component based on a 1999 case, Ford v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
Thus, without guarantees that authors are actually informed as to the envisaged use of their works and the means at their disposal to prohibit it, it is virtually impossible for them to adopt any position whatsoever as to such use.All this said, a few days ago, the CJEU ruled in another case - Spedidam v INA, C-484/18 - that focused on similar issues to those at the centre of Soulier and Doke, with however the factual difference that: (a) the relevant rightholders are performers, and… [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:33 am by Alex Tsang
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The three most-consulted French-language decisions were: 1. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 11:24 pm
The ruling ( here) resulted from a request from the French association Oevre d’assistance aux bêtes d’abattoirs (OABA, submitted to the Ministre de l’ Agriculture et de l’Alimentation (French Minister for Agriculture and Food). [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
A patent owner brought an infringement case against an alleged infringer before French courts. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
The actual or potential use of registered marks in another form is irrelevant when comparing the signs [para. 25] (emphasis added).This is consistent with paragraph 34 of Mitrakos v EUIPO – Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS), which refers to paragraph 38 of Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE). [read post]