Search for: "Ginsburg v. United States"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,908
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am
United States, a “once-in-a-decade insider trading case” that, he argues, presents “a valuable opportunity to clear the underbrush that has accumulated” in American insider trading law. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for historical records showing where a cell phone connects with towers. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), Justice Scalia applied the rule first formulated in Katz v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 2:49 pm
And it looks like there will be election litigation that will make Bush v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm
A notice of the lawsuit, Francis v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:34 am
In Hernandez v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:21 am
In Geier, but not in Williamson, the United States government had supported preemption on the ground that allowing the state-law claims would conflict with agency objectives. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 5:48 am
Case 2: a foreign investor who purchases securities of a foreign issuer on a foreign exchange is harmed by fraud some component of which takes place within the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:29 pm
Yesterday in No. 07-330, Greenlaw v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
United States, the Armed Career Criminal Act case. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:11 am
United States, in which a plurality concluded that a fish is not a tangible object, at least for purposes of criminal liability under the Sarbanes-Oxley act? [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 2:33 pm
The government faced an uphill battle in Wednesday’s argument in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:33 pm
Unfortunately for Burgess, however, the reason the Court was able to move with such velocity was that there was little disagreement that the position of the United States was the correct one; indeed, on Wednesday, April 17, in a unanimous opinion by Justice Ginsburg, the Court affirmed the decision of the Fourth Circuit and ruled against Burgess. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:43 am
For more information about how this case could impact businesses throughout the United States, get in touch with an experienced corporate planning attorney in the U.S. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:29 am
The Court also invited the Acting Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in two cases, Ryan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:03 am
The Court also issued a per curiam decision in United States v. [read post]
