Search for: "Global v. March"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,325
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2020, 6:19 am
In the case of CDK Global v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
Wednesday in Reed Elsevier Inc. et al. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 4:20 pm
Doss Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor (ret.), and Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Ruth V. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The S&P 500 has rallied 40% from its March lows. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm
Media Democracy Festival, Media Reform Coalition, Clore Centre 27 Torrington Square, London WC1E 7JL, 10.00am to 6pm 16 March 2019 3rd Global Conference of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network, Berlin, Germany, 3-5 June 2019. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
It rides on the embers of empire, and Europe's still potent productive and consumptive capacities, to serve a a global superego. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm
On 8 July 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in Aven v Orbis Business Intelligence [2020] EWHC 1741 (QB), (heard 16 to 19 March 2020). [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
Cheaper secret santa friendly versions are also available.3 - No love and affection for XOXO (Global Brand Holdings v EUIPO, EU General Court, Case T‑503/19 (May 2020))To me, the mark XOXO means nothing at all. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 2:39 am
On this occasion, its Private International Law Section organized on 19 March 2015 the Symposium “International Civil Procedure and Brussels I bis”. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:02 am
” Philippines Philippine Foreign Secretary Alberto del Rosario announced his resignation this week, which President Aquino accepted, effective March 7. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
Randolph’s March on Washington Movement in 1941 and the Journey of Reconciliation in 1947 at least hinted at the Birmingham bus boycott. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
Randolph’s March on Washington Movement in 1941 and the Journey of Reconciliation in 1947 at least hinted at the Birmingham bus boycott. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 5:58 pm
Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 5:58 pm
Dakota v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:24 pm
Rowling v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:32 am
The answer is simple:] The existence of a likelihood of confusion must be assessed globally, taking into account all factors relevant to the case".The CJEU has now ruled as follows:Article 4(1)(b) ... [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:06 am
SEC staff have previously denied no-action requests seeking to exclude similar proposals (Exxon Mobil Corporation v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:57 pm
In March, the name change application was approved and the College was now officially RUL. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:05 am
Anyway, you read a bit more about these figures, which are preliminary and will be confirmed and added to on 6 March, here. [read post]
