Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 7,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2008, 7:00 pm
The case had a good overview of prevailing wage law in California, and what it takes to plead such a case. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:25 am
V. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 7:55 am
Of utmost importance here, however, is the fact that the California Court of Appeals has held in The International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:34 am
The claim against the State of California was resolved for a nominal sum ($10,000) and the case proceeded to a jury trial against the trucker and his freight carrier employer. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 7:53 am
In the recent California Supreme Court case of Nickerson v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
Defendant receives the bronchoscopes in question as finished goods packaged in a sealed container. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 9:52 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:39 pm
Virginia in 1967, striking down state bans on marriage of men and women of different races; Romer v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:08 am
Today will be the closing arguments in the Federal challenge to California's Proposition 8. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Smilow, et al. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:27 pm
A reader posted the following comment to yesterday’s post about the CreAgri v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
LEXIS 3682 (ED CA, Jan. 10, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge, ruling on an inmate's habeas corpus petition, recommended concluding that a state court was reasonable when it held that an inmate's free exercise rights were not violated by using his religious necklace with the Eternal Warrior Shield as evidence of affiliation with the Mexican Mafia.In Skandha v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:47 am
More directly related to the California SSPA was the series of cases from Fresno County, California, under the pre-2010 version of that state's SSPA. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:06 am
Hicks v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s June ruling in Moore v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 1:28 pm
Judge Kozinski ends this paragraph by saying "Good dog! [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
That's an argument in favor of changing the law, and I'd conclude it's a good faith one. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
In Camreta and Alford v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
Blue Shield of California (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 1117, 1137; Scripps Clinic v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 10:32 am
If some California legislatures get their way, the situation in that state might soon change. [read post]
