Search for: "Goodwill v. Goodwill"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]
15 May 2014, 2:04 pm
The strongest precedent for Dina would be Worldwide Church of God v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:06 am
Wells Fargo & Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 10:19 am
I wrote about the trial court decision in Rhebergen v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:38 am
Hill v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:13 pm
But in Fifield v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:13 pm
But in Fifield v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 11:00 am
In the New York case Moll v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:12 am
Here is the complaint in Quileute Tribe v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
Bayer Consumer Care AG v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:11 am
Collins v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:31 am
I predict that Mark Lemley will not like this decision but that Mark McKenna will.Boston Cab Dispatch, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
Nellcor Puritan Bennett LLC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
INVISTA North America S.a.r.l. et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:21 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:06 am
BlackBerry Limited v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:13 am
Topek, LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm
Background: CrossFit is a popular fitness training company that licenses its trademarked name and goodwill to about 8,000 affiliates worldwide at $3,000 a year per affiliate. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 3:17 am
One such case is Nigel Woolley and Timesource Ltd v UP Global Sourcing UK Ltd (formerly Ultimate Products Ltd) and Lacmanda Group Ltd (formerly Henleys Clothing Ltd) [2014] EWHC 493 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, ruling of Judge Pelling QC sitting as a judge of the High Court. [read post]
