Search for: "Hale v. Hale" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2011, 5:05 am by Chris Stott, Pannone LLP
Lord Phillips and Lady Hale, considered similar questions in relation to the meaning of ‘benefit’ in confiscation cases (albeit in relation to the preceding statutory regime under Criminal Justice Act 1988) relatively recently as Law Lords in CPS v Jennings [2008] UKHL 29. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
 ([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481), Donald v Ntuli ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) and, most recently, JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal today gave judgment in the case of ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 439). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Feminist JurisprudenceKF2300.F46 2010Feminist judgments : from theory to practice / edited by Rosemary Hunter, Clare McGlynn and Erika Rackley [foreword by Brenda Hale].Oxford Portland, Or. : Hart, 2010. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix.
Lady Hale at §207 and Lord Kerr at §248) they also approved his formulation. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm by Blog Editorial
  First, on Monday 4 and Tuesday 5 April 2011, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:02 am by Clare Montgomery QC, Matrix
This was one of the issues that was (as Lord Hope explained) decided in Watson v M’Ewan? [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:14 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Held: by a majority (Lord Hope and Lady Hale dissenting), allowing the appeal. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:11 am
Citing Sisojeva v Latvia (Eur. [read post]