Search for: "Harmon v. Harmon"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,667
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:45 am
Structurally, the draft Directive is organized into five Titles, containing General Provisions (I), rules on CMOs (II), MTL (III), Enforcement Measures (IV), and Reporting and Final Provisions (V). [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:56 pm
The FTC Staff also again argues that its proposed remedy requiring FDA pre-approval for future disease efficacy claims is justified in light of POM’s past conduct, the complexity of the scientific issues, the expertise of FDA to evaluate this type of claims, and the FTC’s interest in harmonizing with FDA. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:52 am
The case of People of the State of Michigan v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm
In Mercredi v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Alice v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm
South African case law that has referred to European decisions that have caused the UKIPO to summarise the Principles as they have been referred to above include Adcock Ingram v Cipla Medpro (Sabel v Puma), Laugh it off Promotions v SAB (Canon v MGM), Puma v Global Warming (Marca Mode v Adidas) and Cowbell v ICS Holdings (Canon v MGM). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
(Very occasionally it can be an issue of enormous and urgent national consequence, such as Bush v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:40 pm
In other words European compromise in the interpretation of the test would be helpful to us in Africa.Over the past 16 years the highest court in Europe has been called upon to decide the interpretation of the Harmonization Directive and the infringement test at a very rapid and regular rate. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 2:46 pm
Rev. 1071, 1104 (1994). [9] Warner-Jenkinson Co., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:13 am
Sibelius), some achieve moment (Miranda v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:59 pm
This has led (somewhat predictably) to a general questioning of patent law and its proper boundaries, evidenced no more clearly by Justice Breyer's ruminations in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 7:26 pm
White v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:00 pm
Yes, he can, says Hunsaker v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:46 am
“He’s a peaceable soul, ” V’Anne Huser, the father’s attorney, said. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:46 am
“He’s a peaceable soul, ” V’Anne Huser, the father’s attorney, said. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:44 pm
In particular, the Commission may issue an injunction without having to consider the equitable guidelines set forth in the Supreme Court’s decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm
Here's the abstract: In AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:30 am
Third, the definitions of “control” also vary between the Competition Act and the Takeover Regulations, although the fluid nature of the concept may allow for some judicial or regulatory harmonization of the concept across the two sets of laws. [read post]
