Search for: "Harris v. John" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,632
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm by Adam Feldman
The first column shows the number of 5-4 decisions in which the court’s liberal minority, at that time Marshall and Justices William Brennan, Harry Blackmun and John Paul Stevens, formed a bloc in dissent. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:01 pm by Cody M. Poplin
Susan flagged the Department of Justice’s motion to vacate the preliminary injunction in Klayman v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:10 pm
Category: Claim Construction       By: John Kirkpatrick, Contributor  TitleInterval Licensing LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Writing on “Lib Dem Voice”, Dr Evan Harris was more cautious describing the bill as “A good start, but much still to play for. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:47 am by Quinta Jurecic
This week, Daniel Byman fills in for Shane Harris, who has temporarily abandoned the podcast to head off for vacation. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm by David Super
  In theory, Senator McConnell could refuse to recognize such a filibuster just as he (and his predecessor, Senator Harry Reid) did when they changed the Senate’s rules for judicial confirmations. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Jurecic sat down with Thomas Rid and Brandon Van Grack to discuss the Justice Department indictment of Russian national Aleksandr Ionov: Scott Roehm argued that Biden administration officials need to reject the use of evidence obtained by torture in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:27 am by Carol Steiker and Jordan Steiker
Kennedy never joined calls from members of the court (Justices Harry Blackmun, John Paul Stevens, Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg) to reconsider the constitutionality of the death penalty as a punishment, but his jurisprudential glosses on the court’s proportionality doctrine arguably strengthen the case for judicial abolition. [read post]