Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 7,514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2022, 8:59 am
Sheer exhaustion among legislators may also militate against further reform efforts in the next few years, even though a strong case can be made for addressing some changes that did not make the cut—such as bringing the UCMJ’s jury-voting provisions into sync with the unanimity rule the Supreme Court announced in Ramos v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am
The central part of the 117-page opinion, captioned Texas v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 9:23 am
" Roc Nation LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 1:49 pm
A: they are very close. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 9:31 am
Or, more closely aligned with offline duties of care, should it be limited strictly to safety-related criminal offences? [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:54 am
The Supreme Court rejected Nixon’s challenge in Nixon v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 1:28 pm
In the second, Warren v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 6:50 am
After the shooting, he drove to another acquaintance’s house and honked his car horn for thirty minutes. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 6:01 am
The Norwegian archipelago of Svalbard, known as Spitzbergen in Russia, is a group of inhospitable, desolate Arctic islands. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 5:39 pm
He cited Benner v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
But Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Samuel Alito wrote separately to say the changes ordered by the lower court came too close to qualifying and primaries for the fall election and could create “chaos. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
In Collins v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 7:18 am
House. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:52 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
He also showed a wicked sense of humor in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
In Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:55 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 4:47 am
For example, in Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am
The documents filed by the parties in the appeal proceedings are numbered as follows:A1 Decision Edwards Lifesciences AG v. [read post]
