Search for: "Hughes v. State"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,956
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
United States), for federal agents, and to 1961 (Mapp v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:31 am
In Armstrong Pump, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:24 am
At issue in Trusz v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 9:25 pm
” Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
An Iowa high court opinion, State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 12:39 pm
DavisStatutory speedy trial violationFailure to give lesser included offense instructionProsecutorial misconductImproper statements from state witnessesJanuary 30--Friday--a.m.State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 1:25 pm
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:55 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court heard argument in Elonis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:38 am
The lead judgment was given by Lord Neuberger (with which Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge agreed). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 12:08 pm
The Federal Circuit recently issued a non-precedential opinion in Vehicle IP, LLC v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
On 12-13 November, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Dyson, Hughes and Hodge) heard the case of Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions, a challenge to the broad power of detention contained in Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:37 am
Hughes Communications (C.D. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:00 am
In the case of Ion Cârstea v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court heard argument in Warger v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 11:30 am
Here is the abstract: In 1934, in the midst of the Depression, the United States Supreme Court, in Home Building & Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Maryland and United States v. [read post]
Case preview: Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan and another (Respondents) (Scotland)
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
The appeal will be heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 12:14 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a unanimous panel decision in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 7:32 am
Cir. 2014) Halo v PulsePanel: Lourie (author), O’Malley (concurring opinion), Hughes (joining concurrence) Jason wrote about the damages aspects of this case here, but the case also is interesting for its discussion of § 271(a). [read post]
