Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 19,538
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2015, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:13 pm
State of Florida, et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:16 pm
While other international cases have situated domestic violence as a human rights violation, Lenahan v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 6:31 pm
by Kenneth Anderson Over at Lawfare, UVA professor Paul Stephan talks about the ICJ decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 5:38 am
As the European Court of Human Rights put it in Z v Finland (1997) 25 EHRR 371, para 95: Respecting the confidentiality of health data is a vital principle in the legal system of all the contracting parties to the Convention. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:09 am
The meaning of “determination of his civil rights” was considered by the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) in Ringeisen v Austria (No 1) (1971) 1 EHRR 455. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 5:08 pm
However, in nearly 85% of motorcycle v. deer collision, a human is killed. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 3:30 am
On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 594 MS’ application for asylum was rejected in August 2013 and the Secretary of State decided to remove MS from the UK. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:38 am
Within that whole is it not "an affront to human dignity," Abbate v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 5:22 am
Here is the complaint in Glacier County Regional Port Authority v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:27 am
There is no judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (“the European Court”) which establishes an obligation to recognise a gender category other than male or female, and none which would require the Secretary of State to issue passports without any indication of gender. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:00 pm
United States v. $30,670, 401 F.3d 448, 457 (7th Cir. 2005). [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 5:29 am
The House of Lords gave judgment yesterday in this human rights judicial review about provisional listing under Part VII of the Care Standards Act 2000, which sets up a scheme for "listing" people thought unsuitable to work with children and vulnerable adults - and preventing those listed from working in a care position.Before I go on, I'd better declare an interest: back in 1999 and 2000 I was [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm
The recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Matúz v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am
As the 8th District’s decision a couple weeks ago in State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Determining if an employee is a joint employee of two or more employers for the purposes of State and City human rights lawsBrankov v Hazzard, 2016 NY Slip Op 05778, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe decision of the Appellate Division in Brankov, which involved an employment in the private sector, concerned whether “an ostensible non-employer is actually a "joint employer" for purposes of employment discrimination claims under the State… [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
RFAL allows decision-makers to certify any human rights claim, i.e. even in cases without any criminality and liability to deportation. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:35 am
Dunn v Parole Board [2008] EWCA Civ 374; [2008] WLR (D) 110 “In the context of CPR Pt 11, the limitation provisions within s 7(5) of the Human Rights Act 1998 provided a defence to a claim rather than going to jurisdiction, so that a failure to apply to strike out within 14 days of acknowledging service did not preclude a defendant from applying to strike out a claim on the basis of limitation. [read post]
