Search for: "ILLINOIS v. UNITED STATES" Results 1101 - 1120 of 4,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff was also granted leave to file an amended complaint setting out a RLUIPA claim.In United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:00 am by Nathaniel Grow
It has been a little over a year since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am by Brian Shiffrin
In Illinois v Wardlow (528 US 119 [2000]), the United States Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, held that a person in a high crime area fleeing at the sight of police is, by itself, sufficient to create reasonable suspicion, under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:27 pm by Theodore Harvatin
Good Faith Exception for Warrantless Blood Draws in Illinois Similar to Arizona, in People v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:26 am by Zachary C. Jackson
That philosophy is evident in many places, including Seventh Circuit precedent and the local rules for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Students: Can you recommend three books for those interested in learning more about the history of reproductive politics in the United States? [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
 June 30 is the latest the Court has sat since 1996, when the Justices took the bench on July 1 to issue just a single opinion, United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:35 am by Steven Cohen
Kraft Foods Group, Inc. et al – United States States District Court – Northern District of Illinois – October 28, 2022)  involves a claims under the Commodity Exchange Act and the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm by pittlegalscholarship
Michigan Pamela Brandwein (Michigan Political Science) -presents “United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:50 am by David Clark
 So this transcontinental legal dispute continues, in New York (applying Illinois law) and California (where it has now been remanded to state court). [read post]