Search for: "INDIRECT PURCHASERS"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,717
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2012, 1:41 am
At least based on initial impressions, this approach would seem to invite a defense motion based on the Illinois Brick doctrine, which holds that indirect purchasers cannot assert claims for damages under the antitrust laws. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
” … Because of the transportation, electricity and other penalties assigned to Midwest corn ethanol will affect the price of the Midwest ethanol in the California market, the LCFS makes the higher [carbon intensity value] corn-ethanol undesirable to purchase or use. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:23 am
The plaintiffs’ assertion only of common law claims may also avoid certain antitrust claim defenses, such as those available under the Illinois Brick doctrine (which prohibits indirect purchasers from asserting antitrust claims). [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:39 pm
The Canadian Bar Association (CBA) has published a new edition of its Canadian Competition Law Review, which includes articles on indirect purchaser class actions, antitrust immunity agreements, the availability and scale of litigation and investigation costs in private competition law litigation, origins of Canada’s cartel (conspiracy) laws, criminal competition law developments in 2011 and recent merger review developments. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:39 pm
The Canadian Bar Association (CBA) has published a new edition of its Canadian Competition Law Review, which includes articles on indirect purchaser class actions, antitrust immunity agreements, the availability and scale of litigation and investigation costs in private competition law litigation, origins of Canada’s cartel (conspiracy) laws, criminal competition law developments in 2011 and recent merger review developments. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:37 pm
The Canadian Bar Association (CBA) has published a new edition of its Canadian Competition Law Review, which includes articles on indirect purchaser class actions, antitrust immunity agreements, the availability and scale of litigation and investigation costs in private competition law litigation, origins of Canada’s cartel (conspiracy) laws, criminal competition law developments in 2011 and recent merger review developments. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:28 am
The court also agreed that no agreement to arbitrate existed between the developer and any purchaser who did not buy a unit directly from the developer because these indirect purchasers never contracted with the developer and a “meeting of the minds” never occurred. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 4:36 pm
Another potential barrier to many civil claims is the bar on claims by “indirect purchasers” under the Supreme Court case Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:06 am
Where defendant appropriates the copyrighted work and sells it, a court will assume that the work triggered the purchase. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:38 am
Code section 4975(c)(1) prohibits any direct or indirect sale or exchange or leasing of any property between a plan and a disqualified person. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:38 am
Code section 4975(c)(1) prohibits any direct or indirect sale or exchange or leasing of any property between a plan and a disqualified person. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:38 am
Code section 4975(c)(1) prohibits any direct or indirect sale or exchange or leasing of any property between a plan and a disqualified person. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:48 am
The true cost of your commute (considering both direct and indirect costs) is about $1.36 per mile, as of 2010. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:14 am
The Libor scandal first began to unfold more than four years ago, but the with dramatic announcements in late June of the imposition of fines and penalties of over $450 million against Barclays PLC, the scandal has shifted into a higher gear and is now the leading story in financial papers around the world. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:19 pm
That was at best indirect reliance on the appraisals, which is insufficient under Section 552. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:19 pm
That was at best indirect reliance on the appraisals, which is insufficient under Section 552. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:44 pm
Nor can any of the other tens of millions of consumers injured by this illegal conspiracy to violate the Sherman Act.We can't because we're "indirect purchasers" and it's plausible that the banks themselves -- the only ones with standing -- will sue.Mind you, the conspiracy has been ongoing since the dawn of the twenty-first century, and many millions of dollars later, the banks still have not actually sued. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am
The following will be updated as I read and digest today’s landmark pentalogy of Supreme Court of Canada Copyright judgments, which all involve collectives and emanate from the Copyright Board. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 2:27 pm
That statute rendered unenforceable any contractual provision requiring “a purchaser or end user of a product to indemnify, hold harmless, or defend a manufacturer of a product. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 3:24 pm
An indirect tax may only be imposed on a profitable transaction or use the profit on which is or is readily convertible into a monetary equivalent. [read post]
