Search for: "In re Grant" Results 1101 - 1120 of 33,714
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
"If therefore found that Petitioner had failed to show excusable neglect, and it denied the motion to re-open discovery.As to the motion to re-set the testimony periods, the standard for granting such an extension of time is good cause. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 8:47 am by rainey Reitman
This is a dangerous expansion of powers, and not something to be granted without any public debate on the topic. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 10:01 pm
****UPDATE2Of David's second comment, declarations in re-examination evoke to me the silly arguments made by FTCR and PubPat in the re-examinations of three WARF patents in the embryonic stem cell area. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day is In re Finserve Group Ltd. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:16 pm
  In re ESTATE OF Opal Mae TAPLEY 312 Ga.App. 234Court of Appeals of Georgia [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 7:52 am by Andrew Wagner
The post Follow Up – Class Counsel Granted $20.4 Million Attorneys’ Fee Award in Dish Network Telemarketing Case appeared first on Class Actions Brief. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:00 am by Amy Howe
  The Court granted review in three of the petitions that were currently pending before it, setting aside a whopping five-and-a-half hours of oral argument time in March to consider a broad range of questions relating to the Act. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:29 am by Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion to transfer for improper venue and rejected plaintiff's argument that In re Cray’s three-part definition for "regular and established place of business" should not apply to web-based businesses. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”Whereas the first part of the sentence of R 164(2), preceding the [first use of the] word “or”, concerns the lack of unity of the invention in respect of the application documents on which the European grant procedure is to be based, the second part of R 164(2), following the [first] “or”, deals with the situation where [the applicant] seeks protection for an invention that had not been covered by the international (or supplementary European) search report. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:00 pm
On June 1, 2009 the Supreme Court granted certiorari to Bernard L. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:49 pm
In a case that will have a profound effect on the enforceability of agreements containing class action waivers, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently held in In re American Express Merchants' Litigation that, depending upon the circumstances, an agreement prohibiting merchants from filing a class action for claims under federal antitrust law would grant a defendant "de facto immunity from antitrust liability by removing plaintiffs' only… [read post]