Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 1101 - 1120 of 5,486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
 By comparison, the Financial CHOICE Act (H.R. 10) would repeal the entirety of the specialized disclosure provisions, including the authority for the SEC’s resource extraction issuer’s rule (Congress disapproved the SEC’s resource extraction issuers rule earlier this year via the Congressional Review Act), plus required studies of inspectors general and of core and brokered deposits. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:52 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
All contempt proceedings brought pursuant to P.L.1991, c.261 (C.2C:25-17 et seq.) shall be subject to any rules or guidelines established by the Supreme Court to guarantee the prompt disposition of criminal matters. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:10 pm by Michel-Adrien Sheppard
Whether the harassment offence in section 10 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997 should be amended to incorporate a specific reference to cyber-harassment, including indirect cyber-harassment (…); 2. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:02 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Originally, an employee or dependent was required, among other things, to have experienced a loss of coverage as a result of an involuntary termination occurring between September 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009 to qualify for coverage under the COBRA premium subsidy rules as “assistance eligible individual for up to 9 months. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:50 am by Roel van Woudenberg
As to auxiliary requests 5 to 10 and 13 to 23, the board noted that claim 1 of each request, although amended, did not comply with Article 123(2) EPC for essentially the same reasons as claim 1 of the main request.XI. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:08 pm by Jamie Markham
  (1) The trial court retained jurisdiction to amend a sentence until the time for notice of appeal expires; (2) Amendment of a drug trafficking sentence to include the maximum term that corresponds to the mandatory minimum sentence was a clerical correction that the trial court could make outside of the defendant’s presence. [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:43 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
A test’s SEM is a statistical fact, a reflection of the inherent imprecision of the test itself” (10). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Patent relative: only the top 10% get into the contest at all. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:16 am by Jerri Lynn Ward, J.D.
However, this general rule does not apply when the procedural, so the rules above may well apply to proceedings pending as of September 1, 2011. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Jennifer S. Taub
An amended complaint was filed, adding JCM as a defendant and alleging that JCG and JCM are liable for fraud under Section 10(b), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “34 Act)” and related SEC Rule 10b-5. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 10:21 am
Set out below is a compilation of those precedential rulings, categorized according to subject matter. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
Hobbs (relisted after the 9/26 Conference) Docket:  10-9647 Issue(s):  Whether imposing a sentence of life without possibility of parole on an offender who was 14 at the time he committed capital murder constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 12:05 pm by LindaMBeale
Similarly, the IRS Is moving ahead with the oversight rules for requiring "preparer tax identification numbers" (PTINs) for all preparers on federal returns starting Jan. 1. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 6:43 am by Thomas B. Griffith
  https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/05/us/laurence-silberman-dead.html; https://www.washingtonpost.com/obituaries/2022/10/03/laurence-silberman-federal-appeals-judge/; https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/the-most-intimidating-judge-i-ever-met-reflections-on-judge-laurence-silberman/; https://www.wsj.com/articles/america-loses-a-judicial-giant-laurence-silberman-restraint-dc-circuit-constitution-judge-legacy-scalia-clerks-second-amendment-11664750990 I shall miss him. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court ruled the longstanding prohibition on independent expenditures by corporations violated the First Amendment. [read post]