Search for: "JAY v. State" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2007, 11:44 pm
" I say:If Roe were overruled, [state] legislatures would decide how to regulate abortion. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
United States USA today had a piece “Rudy Giuliani’s ‘Borat 2’ scene: What can he do about it legally? [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:58 am by Lyle Denniston
” Circuit Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain wrote the dissenting opinion, joined by Circuit Judges Jay S. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
” In his dissent in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
A woman has recently filed a lawsuit claiming that she gave birth to Beyonce and Jay-Z’s daughter, Blue Ivy Carter, and should be recognized as the child’s legal mother. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
  In response to the debate the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Gareth Johnson) told the House that these matters would be dealt with in legislation which, he said, was being drafted. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 5:12 pm
” The Miranda rights, named after the landmark Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
James Room)Panel 3: The Disciplinary State, 2:00-3:30Chair: Erin Braatz, Suffolk University Law School (ebraatz@suffolk.edu)Commentator: Lauren Benton, Vanderbilt University (lauren.benton@vanderbilt.edu)Stacey Hynd, University of Exeter (s.hynd@exeter.ac.uk) (Re-)Constructing Murder: Capital Punishment and the Criminalization of African Bodies in Colonial Ghana, c. 1890-1957Dior Konate, South Carolina State University (dkonate@scsu.edu) Imprisonment and Citizenship in… [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
.), Attorney General Jeff Sessions stated, “I have concluded that this is a rare case where the proper course is to forgo defense of Section 5000(A)(a)” but that the decision not to defend the constitutionality of the individual mandate “will not prevent the court in Texas v. [read post]