Search for: "JJS" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DOWLING, JJ. 2020-07794(Index No. 473/19)                                      [*1]In the Matter of Robert LaBella, respondent,vNew York City Employees' Retirement System, appellant. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
29 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
LANDICINO, JJ.2023-05014(Index No. 58551/22)[*1]Chappaqua Congress of Teachers, et al., appellants,vBoard of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., respondents.Robert T. [read post]
29 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
LANDICINO, JJ.2023-05014(Index No. 58551/22)[*1]Chappaqua Congress of Teachers, et al., appellants,vBoard of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District, et al., respondents.Robert T. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In dissent in 303 Creative, Sotomayor J (Kagan and Jackson JJ concurring) held that the Colorado law in question targeted conduct, not speech – and since, on this view, the restriction did not engage the right to freedom of expression at all, she did not need to reach the question of whether it survived scrutiny. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
Scalia, Kennedy, and Souter, JJ., joined that opinion in full. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Krishna Iyer, JJ. had to consider whether a compromise signed by the pleader of one of the parties was binding on that party. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm by Heather Donkers
A majority of the Supreme Court (Côté and Rowe JJ. dissenting) allowed the appeals, finding that s. 737 infringes s. 12 of the Charter and is not saved by s. 1. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:35 am
., and STEVENS, SCALIA, GINSBURG, BREYER, ALITO, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm by Heather Donkers
A majority of the Supreme Court (Côté and Rowe JJ. dissenting) allowed the appeals, finding that s. 737 infringes s. 12 of the Charter and is not saved by s. 1. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:49 am by Ilya Shapiro
Stevens and O’Connor, JJ., delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to BCRA Titles I and II, in which Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., joined. . . . [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Krishna Iyer, JJ. had to consider whether a compromise signed by the pleader of one of the parties was binding on that party. [read post]