Search for: "Jacobs, in Re"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2012, 1:35 pm
All of us, presumably, recognize that there are occasions for drawing lines in the sand, even as we also must, unless we’re truly fanatics, recognize that politics requires a willingness to settle for significantly less than we might wish, not least in order to preserve social peace.I have now read the book, and I would have answered the question differently, for one of the striking things about their book, written, of course, by two world-class political theorists, is the degree to… [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:50 pm
The 11th Circuit found he was not coerced into changing his mind when the officers told him "Fine, but we're going to have to get a search warrant. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:07 am
Ezra Klein of the Washington Post argues that “if you’re Anthony Kennedy and John Roberts, and you want to rule against the individual mandate but you’re worried about a public backlash, this poll calms your fears. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
The court therefore held that the reimbursement provisions of the compensation legislation did “not violate Jacob’s constitutional right to due process by retroactively reviving a cause of action previously extinguished by the statute of repose.” In re Individual 35W Bridge Litigation, 806 N.W.2d 820, 833 (Minn. 2011). [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court denied Jacobs Engineering’s request and refused to hear the case. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:27 pm
DissentA strong dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc was written by Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:27 pm
” See In Re American Express Merchants' Litigation.pdf., 667 F.2d 204 (2d Cir. 2012) (“AMEX III”). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Based upon the principles of finality (res judicata and estoppel) and certainty, once a judgment has been rendered by a foreign court, a Canadian court cannot look into the merits. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:29 am
“Just because you’re an arrogant SOB or philanderer, that’s not the same as committing a crime. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
That’s not much so you’re better off passing on drinking if you’re the driver.What will the investigation focus on? [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:04 am
Still, there's no state law stopping them from doing so and that's why we're calling on you. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
In re American Express Merchants’ Litig., 667 F.3d 204 (2nd Cir. 2012) ("Amex III"). [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:12 pm
They’re not budding sexual molesters. [read post]
27 May 2012, 6:00 am
That’s not much so you’re better off passing on drinking if you’re the driver.What will the investigation focus on? [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:46 am
It's going to be tough to get these young drivers to put the phones away while they're on our roadways. [read post]
26 May 2012, 2:01 pm
It’s doubtful you’d suspect the cut of meat you’re eating at dinner was subject to patent. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:59 am
"Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:36 pm
The second circuit then refused to re-hear the case en banc, prompting Chief Judge Jacobs to issue a rare dissent on the denial to re-hear the case en banc.The CJ's attack on the veracity of the plaintiffs/lawyers is startling, and the CJ's comparison of the plaintiffs to a disturbed pro se plaintiff suing the CIA for thought control is downright amusing. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:31 pm
Indeed, the court was evenly divided on the government's request for the case to be re-heard by all 12 judges of the Second Circuit. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionSupplemental brief of petitionerReply of petitionerCVSG Information:Invited: November 7, 2011Filed: April 25, 2012 (Deny) ________________________________________________________________ The following petitions have been re-listed for the conference of May 24. [read post]
