Search for: "John Doe Corporations 1-3" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2013, 7:24 am by Broc Romanek
PGM expects three kinds of integration synergy: (1) increased sales through targeted marketing based on analysis of PGM and Accordia's combined 2 million client base, (2) capital and other cost synergies and (3) opportunity to acquire additional high profit golf courses by leveraging lower capital cost. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 2:57 pm by Julia Lohmann
Yet history has shown that peace does not come, nor will our freedom be preserved, by good will alone. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 6:01 am by Adam Greaves
Decision: DOJ explained that it did not intend to take enforcement action based on the disclosed facts and circumstances, including that: (1) the firm had no business before the entities that might send officials; (2) the firm obtained written assurance the visit would not violate any PRC laws; (3) the foreign Ministry would select the officials participating; (4) the firm would pay all costs directly to providers; and (5) the firm would not pay expenses for spouses, family, or… [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
Corporation of Charleston, 1 S.C.L. (1 Bay) 441 (S.C. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 9:51 am by Don Cruse
AND JOHN WEAKLY, No. 11-0589 that the Court does not have jurisdiction to consider this type of “direct appeal” mandamus action. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Under BCL §623(h)(1), Capsag had 20 days after the expiration of the 90-day negotiation period, or until November 30, 2011, within which to commence a judicial valuation proceeding. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Under BCL §623(h)(1), Capsag had 20 days after the expiration of the 90-day negotiation period, or until November 30, 2011, within which to commence a judicial valuation proceeding. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 8:54 am by Victoria VanBuren
It contended that (1) the parties never achieved anything more than an agreement to agree, (2) that compliance with the agreement could not be ordered because its terms are too indefinite, and (3) that the agreement did not satisfy the statute of frauds. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 7:10 am by Rob Robinson
Putting the TREC 2009 Study in Perspective – http://bit.ly/QFYUpC (Steve Green, Mark Yacano) Counsel’s Top Predictive Coding Concerns; Part 3 – Fear of Inadvertent Productions – http://bit.ly/PJVBLk (Bill Tolson) Courts Agree: It’s Easy to Waive Your Attorney-Client Privilege – http://bit.ly/PreW3A (Jason Krause) eDiscovery: Corporate Defendants Strike Back – http://bit.ly/Prd6Qo (Joseph Fogel, Todd Ohlms) eDiscovery Origins: Zubulake… [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
The company’s press release does not indicate that any portion of the settlement will be funded by insurance. [read post]