Search for: "Judges of U.S. Supreme Court" Results 1101 - 1120 of 35,632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2024, 10:17 am by Matthew Loughran
So, unless there is an appeal to the Fifth Circuit and then to the Supreme Court that adopts the reasoning of the judge here, it does not apply as authority nationwide. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am by Trane Robinson
  Judges keen to flag an issue worthy of Supreme Court review may write a separate opinion from the denial en banc review. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”              There is no doubt that Hasen’s proposed amendment would cure, for once and for all, the lacunae announced (and embraced) by the Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The March 4 United States Supreme Court decision that Donald Trump could not be disqualified under the terms of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment was a win for Trump but a loss for the Court itself. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Matey dissented, arguing that (at least under the Supreme Court's decision in TransUnion v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:51 am by Jonathan H. Adler
According to Judge Robinson, the conclusion that an association must identify at least one injured member by name (at least at the summary judgment stage or when seeking a preliminary injunction) follows from the logic of Supreme Court precedents (such as Summers v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Sarah Huckabee Sanders The Doobie-ous Redaction Award: U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Korinne Dunn
Supreme Court is considering the permissibility of such terms. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
She scheduled treatments to have that second child, but the Alabama Supreme Court shut down IVF treatments across the state, unleashed by a Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:15 am by Beatrice Yahia
Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan said the decision to keep the jury anonymous is appropriate because “there is a likelihood of bribery, jury tampering, or of physical injury or harassment of juror(s). [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:43 am by Alex Phipps
Additionally, the court explained that even if there was an error, it was not a type recognized as structural by the Supreme Court, referencing the list identified in State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:08 am by Samuel Bray
One good corrective would be to have more occasions where the Supreme Court or a court of appeals dissolves a preliminary injunction and remands the case for further proceedings, including trial once there has been some experience with the enforcement of the challenged statute or rule. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” This is precisely what the Supreme Court called for in TSC Industries v. [read post]