Search for: "King v. United States Government" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,665
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm by Alex Potcovaru
United States and the implications of the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 3:32 pm by Nathan Sheard
In the weeks and months following the nationwide protests against police violence, we continued to work closely with our fellow Electronic Frontier Alliance members, local ACLU chapters, and other dedicated organizers to support new bans on government face surveillance across the United States, including in Boston, MA, Portland, OR, Minneapolis, MN, and Kings County, WA. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:08 am by Scott Bomboy
” The United States Supreme Court passed on a case about a similar issue back in 2016, American Freedom Defense Initiative v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  He set out an admirable vision of what it might mean to live in a “republican form of government” dependent for its ultimate legitimacy on the capacity of the public to engage in self-governance, to offer their truly informed “consent” as suggested in the Declaration of Independence.I think it is fair to say that neither Mark nor Jennifer is suffused with a Jeffersonian spirit. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 2:50 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On Monday 7 October, there was a PTR in the case of Atole Timothy Enaholo v Claims Governance Totally PLC and another QB-2022-001025 before Kerr J. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Doyle Hodges
§ 332 states, “Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may … use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion” (emphasis added). [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:51 pm by Brandon Duke
Several of these disputes involved frequent dance partners: the State of Texas and the federal government. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
During Tuesday’s oral argument before the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:46 am
Robertson Subscription Required RICHMOND COUNTYTorts Triable Issues of Fact of Whether Premises Single Or Multiple Unit Dwelling Preclude Judgment Breeden v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:40 am
Attempts to Regulate Payday Lenders Currently, garnishment of social security benefits is illegal and all active-duty military families are protected by the Military Lending Act signed into law on October 2006 - capping interest rates at 36% on all small loans, including payday loans, for all military families.[43] Small loans are governed by state law, and many states have implemented restrictions on payday lenders.[44] For example, many state have placed… [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I increasingly believe that the Court, certainly as a collective institution (an “it”) and even as a disaggregated group of individual justices (the “they”) has remarkably little that is genuinely useful to say about the deep questions that are necessarily presented by contemplating, for example, the idea of “representative government,” government “by the consent of the governed,” or, ultimately, what one might mean by a… [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am by Scott Bomboy
"If I were king, I would not allow people to go around burning the American flag. [read post]
California Fish and Game Commission litigation Governor Gavin Newsom’s appointment of a fifth member of the California Fish and Game Commission That Commission’s October 9, 2022 hearing, where consideration of the petition to list the western Joshua tree (WJT) as a threatened species was continued for a second time The United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s proposed listing of the Bay-Delta longfin smelt on October 7 First, on September 21, 2022, the California… [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
District court: Given the two overlapping cases, I'm going to stay the United States' state-law claims to allow their resolution in the state-court action. [read post]