Search for: "Labelle v. State" Results 1101 - 1120 of 8,153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2010, 6:34 am by Brian Wolfman
Levine, the Supreme Court held generally that the FDA's marketing approval of a drug and its labeling does not preempt a state-law personal-injury suit premised on the inadequacy of that labeling. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
Morse, 15 How. 62 (1854), as an enablement decision, even though in both Alice and Mayo, the court had labeled O’Reilly as an eligibility decision. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”  That was enough to show standing, as required by Spokeo v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:23 pm by Russell Jackson
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 216 Ill.2d 100 (2005) through Barbara's Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 479 F.3d 383 (5th Cir 2007) -- that the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act does not preempt such state law claims. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:23 am
That was the issue recently in the Second Department in People v Taylor, 2007 NY Slip Op 03111. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 9:04 am
We should not let this happen," stated Dr. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:30 am by Richard Goldfarb
District Court for the Southern District of Illinois dismissed the case of Kremers v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:39 am
Though the lender provided a label with a tracking number, the court stated that it was not indisputable proof that the lender sent the letter. [read post]