Search for: "Libertarian Party" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,966
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am by Richard A. Epstein
  Instead in choosing Paul Ryan he has signaled that he plans to continue on the limited government approach that stresses dollars-and-cents issues over the social issues – think abortion and gay rights – that have for so long divided the social conservatives from the more libertarian wing of the Republican Party. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:19 am by Joe Kristan
Fair Tax Gives Gary Johnson Some Hiccups On The Trail (Garrett Quinn, Reason.com): When Libertarian presidential nominee Gary Johnson brought up the Fair Tax at his party’s nominating convention in Las Vegas, he was occasionally booed and even heckled by some of the delegates in the hall. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 2:24 pm by Dennis Crouch
 When some third party holds a patent, that patent limits what I can do with my scarce private property as well as my individual freedoms. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 1:51 am by Lawrence Cunningham
U.S. citizens may be conservative or liberal, Republican or Democrat, even libertarian or socialist. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 2:07 pm by Elie Mystal
[Longview News-Journal] Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Brian Tannebaum, Early Voting, Election 2012, Kevin Green, Libertarians, Mitt Romney, Non-Sequiturs, Politics, Racism, Saint Louis University Law School, Sharpie Party, St. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:48 am by Roger Pilon
Long dominated by Borkian conservatives, it has slowly shifted over the years in the libertarian direction – not entirely, to be sure, but significantly. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:20 am by Jennifer Campbell Goddard
The Tea Party has their own PR department, they do not need your business blog. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:49 am by SHG
New Hampshire is a two-party consent state, except for police. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:37 pm by Leslie Harris
  The Campbell piece was timed to build on the so-called Paul "manifesto" that set out Libertarian principles for the Internet, which can be boiled down to "no regulation ever. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 6:57 pm by Eric Biber
  (Also note that this third group is one that spans both major parties and is more regional than ideological or belief-based – Democrats in West Virginia are just as motivated by this rationale as Republicans in Wyoming.) [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:44 am by Josh Sturtevant
Gay rights: I believe that gay rights would be strengthened due to Libertarian/Green/Democrat support of the issue. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 6:57 am by admin
  Mark Calabria, an economist for the libertarian Cato Institute, said “there’s a tremendous amount of research that shows that voucher programs are more effective than anything we do in building assisted, affordable rental housing. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 6:20 am by Josh Sturtevant
I think there would be a Libertarian party dedicated to reducing government and government’s role in the economy and people’s lives. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:00 am by Josh Sturtevant
Whether or not the five more or less reliable conservative votes fall in line behind the libertarian leanings of their party, or maybe if the liberal side of the court might take up the banner of freedom is unclear. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 5:36 am by Lawrence Solum
If no third parties were affected (and assuming that consent was freely given on the basis of adequate information), then the consented-to activity would maximize utility. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:52 am by Gritsforbreakfast
For many years the only time the Fourth Amendment came up in Texas campaigns was when politicians (from both parties) promised to scale back its protections in response to the "war on drugs" and/or the "war on terror. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 11:00 am by Timothy B. Lee
Rand Paul (R-KY), the son of libertarian Congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul, visited the conservative Heritage Foundation on Thursday to sketch out his agenda for preserving Internet freedom. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
Justice Kennedy, generally the Court’s ideological center, early on asked: “I understand we must presume laws are constitutional, but even so, when you are changing the relation of the individual to the government in this, what we can stipulate is, I think, a unique way, do you not have a heavy burden of justification to show the authorization under the Constitution” – a question straight out of the Tea Party playbook. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:19 am by Glenn
” That’s a philosophy largely embraced by both major American parties regardless of the increasingly polarized political landscape in Washington, DC. [read post]