Search for: "Lisa May " Results 1101 - 1120 of 5,171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Test, Trace, and Isolate: COVID-19 and the Canadian Constitution, Lisa M. [read post]
30 May 2020, 6:59 am
We may still have the feelings that led politicians before the Kennedy Era to present us with a sternly serious face. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
As Trump Removes Federal Watchdogs, Some Loyalists Replacing Them Have ‘Preposterous’ Conflicts MSN – Lisa Rein and Tom Hamburger (Washington Post) | Published: 5/24/2020 For the first time since the system was created in the aftermath of the Watergate scandal, inspectors general find themselves under systematic attack from the president, putting independent oversight of federal spending and operations at risk. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:32 am by Ron Friedmann
Lisa points outs that GC role has shifted from legal to business advisor. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:36 am
The issue is out tomorrow , don’t miss it I’m really excited for you to see all the other looks 🌈🌈🌈A post shared by Lisa Eldridge (@lisaeldridgemakeup) on May 23, 2020 at 7:58am PDT [read post]
27 May 2020, 2:55 pm by Charissa Laisy
Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University John Blair Bickerstaff Ann and Mark Casella Lisa and Dick Cashin Beth and Michael Fascitelli Barbara and Stephen Friedman Kathryn O. [read post]
27 May 2020, 12:00 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
By Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, Nicholson Price, Rachel Sachs, and Jacob S. [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Appeals Court Greenlights Emoluments Suit against Trump Politico – Josh Gerstein | Published: 5/14/2020 A lawsuit accusing President Trump of violating the Constitution by accepting foreign government money through his Washington, D.C. hotel can proceed to fact-gathering about Trump’s profits, a federal appeals court ruled. [read post]
20 May 2020, 1:58 pm by Jason Rantanen
Innovators can use traditional search tools, but without context, in particular reliable assignee or product information, may be hard-pressed to find relevant technology. [read post]
20 May 2020, 10:45 am by Don Cruse
They include (as of the time of this blog post): Texas Public Policy Foundation (May 13) An emailed amicus submission from a citizen in Houston (May 14) Honest Elections Project (May 15) McCaffity for Congress (May 15) A group of Medical Doctors (May 19) A group of Healthcare Professionals and Institutions (May 19) A group including the National Medical Association Argument day itself The official submission schedule indicates that… [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:30 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Sherkow, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, Nicholson Price, and Rachel SachsLast week, we focused on incentives for developing clinical evidence supporting the use of remdesivir for COVID-19 and analyzed the FDA’s grant of an emergency use authorization (EUA) for the drug. [read post]
19 May 2020, 10:37 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
In addition, the proceedings in which it may be “subsequently found that there has been no infringement or threat of infringement” are the main proceedings, because the first two sentences of Article 50.7 already deal with situations that may have led to the lifting of the preliminary injunction within the procedural milieu of interim injunction proceedings. [read post]
19 May 2020, 10:11 am by Adam Feldman
The data in this post was taken from the four telephonic arguments from the week of May 4: U.S. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:33 am by Thomas Musmann (Rospatt Osten Pross)
“ (source: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, May 13, 2020, p. 2, see here) Translation: “The EU Commission is examining an infringement procedure. [read post]
15 May 2020, 9:05 pm by Jamison Chung
  The federal government should create a national license to practice telepsychiatry and adopt preemptive legislation regulating mental health care services through telemedicine, Lisa Parciak argues in a recent article in the West Virginia Law Review. [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:52 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
However, the Enlarged Board found that a particular interpretation which has been given to a legal provision can never be taken as carved in stone, because the meaning of the provision may change or evolve over time. [read post]