Search for: "Lloyd v. State" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am by Law Lady
State Farm Lloyds, 202 S.W.3d 744 (Tex. 2006).Chinese Drywall: CHINESE DRYWALL-RELATED LOSS NOT AN 'ACCIDENT' FOR COVERAGE PURPOSES, Lopez v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, LondonDocket: 09-945Issue(s): Whether Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act is an “Act of Congress” subject to the anti-preemption provision of the McCarran-Ferguson Act.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replySupplemental brief for petitioner Title: Hogan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[1] Thus, for example, Graber showed, among his many other myth-busting insights, that Marbury v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States In South Carolina the case of Charleston City Paper has confirmed libel law principles, Blog Law Online comments. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Bouchart reports: The landmark ruling stated that although the work of journalist Denis Robert contained inaccuracies, the thoroughness of his investigation and the public interest in the story outweighed the defamatory claims. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
Media and Freedom of Expression Law in Other Jurisdictions In Lassanah v State of New South Wales (No. 3) [2010] NSWDC 241 The New South Wales considered a claim for false imprisonment and defamation. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm by INFORRM
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am by INFORRM
Moreover, in the UK, (in direct contradistinction from the Innsbruck decision) the decision of the Court of Appeal in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (02 October 2019) (which I discuss briefly here) held that plaintiffs can recover damages for loss of control of their data without proving pecuniary loss or distress. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 2:20 pm
The lawsuit was re-filed in New York State Supreme Court on Wednesday. [read post]