Search for: "Matter of Jones v Jones"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2007, 1:51 am
See Jones v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Reed and Lord Hodge gave the main judgment, with which Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Hamblen agreed. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
The Supreme Court has announced judgments of the following will be handed down on Wednesday 30 March next week: - Jones v Kaney, heard 11 – 12 January 2011 (here is our case preview); and - Duncombe and Others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, heard 17-18 January 2011 (here is our case preview). [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Pretty Polly Limited); and Baker v Quantum Clothing Group… [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 10:49 am
See e.g., Jones v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:19 pm
As a general proposition, expert testimony is properly admitted to help lay jurors understand matters that are not ordinarily within their understanding akin to People v Brown and People v Lee. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:25 am
Jones, 281 Md. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 7:57 am
It is well settled that a post-trial motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 cannot preserve a contention for review that is raised for the first time in the motion (see People v McFadden, 94 AD3d 1150, 1150; People v Jones, 85 AD3d 1667, 1668), but as noted that is not what occurred here inasmuch as defendant made an objection before jury selection. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
The courts have increasingly accepted that whether or not a covenant is remediable is a matter of fact and so a pragmatic approach should be taken. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
The courts have increasingly accepted that whether or not a covenant is remediable is a matter of fact and so a pragmatic approach should be taken. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 5:39 pm
Jones, 69 M.J. 294, 299 (C.A.A.F., 2011). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 7:51 am
Mills v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am
Jones, in which the Court will consider whether police need a warrant to put a GPS tracking device on a suspect’s vehicle. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:32 am
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937); Atlas Roofing Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:22 am
” Ashby Jones of the Wall Street Journal Law Blog interviews Prof. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 8:30 pm
The most interesting part of the dissent is CJ Effron's suggestion, citing Jones v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 2:44 am
"- Jones Day"We do not represent you just because you send an email"The opposing counsel sends a subpoena requesting the informationNot enough to let the client sending an email know information will not be held in confidence. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:32 am
Justice lawyers said the high court’s decision in Reichle v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:26 pm
Jones on the U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:39 pm
Nov. 22, 2010) (Jones, J.). [read post]
