Search for: "May 22, 2023 Order" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
On 9 June 2023, Lee J ordered that the trial in the case of Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Limited (Tribunal of Fact) [2023] FCA 612 will be heard by the ordinary mode of a judge sitting alone. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 10:59 pm by Michael Douglas
 (2023) 97 ALJR 276; [2023] HCA 11, [43]–[46]; Schibsby v Westenholz (1870) LR 6 QB 155, 159. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:34 pm by Joshua Lloyd
A new edition of Dorsaneo & Chandler's Texas Claims and Defenses is available for pre-order on the LexisNexis Store . [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 3:29 pm by Anthony Zaller
AB 1288 was approved by the California Assembly on May 31, 2023, and is now being reviewed by the state Senate. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Avianca, Inc., No. 22-cv-1461 (PKC), 2023 WL 3966209, at *1-2 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:15 am by Marcel Pemsel
Even if the relevant publics are identical or overlap, the goods and services may be so dissimilar that the later mark is unlikely to bring the earlier mark to mind. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 4:33 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
This week we bring in Christian Lang, the CEO and founder of LEGA, a company that provides a secure platform for law firms and legal departments to safely implement and govern the use of large language models (LLMs) like Open AI’s GPT-4, Google’s Bard, and Anthropic’s Claude. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:46 pm by David Kopel
Pursuant to General Order no. 101 (May 30, 1865), Union soldiers were allowed to buy their government-issued firearm for a deduction from their monthly pay. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm by Stan Gibson
Netflix, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-07556-RGK-SHK (May 24, 2023)   The authors of www.PatentLawyerBlog.com are patent trial lawyers at Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A copy of the memorandum was also attached to a letter that respondent’s attorney sent to the New York City Law Department on June 22, 2021 (Resp. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A copy of the memorandum was also attached to a letter that respondent’s attorney sent to the New York City Law Department on June 22, 2021 (Resp. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
  In doing so, she made no error in law [22]. [read post]