Search for: "Means v. State"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 61,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 11:47 am
Don't care what some states have started to do. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 7:09 am
The savings clause simply means that plaintiffs may bring FLSA collective actions based on violations of state wage and hour laws that are stricter than federal requirements. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
"] From Grayson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:05 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:20 am
What Does Texas Mean by Super Aggravated Sexual Assault? [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:30 am
" Another may examine the suggestion that even if Trump is constitutionally disqualified from being President of the United States, that does not mean he is constitutionally ineligible to be elected as President of the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
So, when they say a state jail felon is a felon for purposes of section 46.04, they mean it. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:12 am
Prior to Myriad, the US Supreme Court held in Mayo v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 11:06 am
This decision means that states can now enforce their own state laws against national banks so long as they follow due process procedures set forth under state law. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:20 am
Background In United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:26 am
European Union and United States authorities have announced the “EU-U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:13 am
The Court considered the principle established in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex p Onibiyo [1996] QB 768, that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 6:43 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
According to the opinions of Justices in the majority in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:20 am
In Maldonado v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 6:55 am
The case is Kimmel v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 9:12 am
Monday’s opinion in Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 12:23 pm
The post Predicting a Fragmented Vote in <i>United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 8:09 am
This week, the UK Supreme Court refused permission to appeal in the matter of Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union v Wightman and others. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:14 pm
In the space below, I lay out another, heretofore unexamined, way in which ISL theory makes jejune and unsupportable assumptions about the meaning of constitutional text.One easy starting point to access this additional argument is the Supreme Court’s seminal 2015 case rejecting ISL, Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
