Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 1101 - 1120 of 4,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2020, 4:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
These are precisely the types of laws that the Supreme Court overturned in District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 6:56 am by Lila Margalit
On Feb. 9, the Israeli Supreme Court handed down its judgement in Katz v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 1:53 am by Sophie Corke
Dr Mateo Aboy (University of Cambridge) discussed whether recent case law is ‘good’ for precision medicine with an empirical analysis of patent judgments in the US and Europe. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:16 pm by Eric Goldman
In the afternoon roundtable, one participant claimed that Hassell v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm by Richard W. Parker
In fact, the available evidence supports precisely the opposite prediction. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am by Alex Woolgar
The court can award a 100% uplift on those damages, using the Walmsley v Education Limited [2014] IPEC case where that uplift was treated as a standard royalty in the industry for reproduction of photographs without attribution. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 10:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In fairness to the court of appeals, this is a known problem of using “controversial” as a standard in a lawsuit over compelled commercial speech, where there is by definition a controversy. [read post]