Search for: "People v Long"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 19,520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2023, 11:54 am
And in Doe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 9:26 am
If you want another example, think of Jacobson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 6:19 am
"The American people have no reason in the world to think it's going to work just like the president paints it," said one of those backers, Senator Pete V. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:18 am
In Williams v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am
In Harris v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 7:28 am
Some are good, some are bad, some are just plan poorly reasoned and worthy of criticism no matter which side of the “v” you favor. [read post]
12 May 2016, 10:59 am
Perhaps the FTC will give them some leeway so long as they don’t adopt an in-your-face name like Jerk.com. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:27 am
Last year, in District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am
Two days ago, I began describing a forthcoming paper of mine offering a new take on Windsor v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:30 am
In Tandon v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:06 pm
Now the Sixth Circuit has joined the action in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 6:27 am
A copy of the ruling is linked to in the story, but links to other sites don't always stay good for a long time, so I'll link to it here on my own server so it stays a part of our record. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 8:59 pm
Corbello v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
R (Ahmad) v Newham LBC[2009] UKHL 14 (our report) suggested that, as long as a reasonable preference was given to all homeless applicants, there was no reason why an authority should not decide to give further priority to one group over another, as long as it was not irrational. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
In Bellotti v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 2:38 pm
Barak’s recent paper on the “rabbinic cartels” reminded me that I wanted to provide some updates on Kamakahi v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 8:15 am
Magistrate Judge Denlow held a status hearing yesterday morning in the USA v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
Case citation: Philpot v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:54 am
That argument does not engage with the right to privacy, which has long generated controversy, or other aspects of Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The California Supreme Court had a precedent from 2011, People v. [read post]
