Search for: "People v Then"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 72,955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:56 am
Decorum required that people not use the word “liar,” but it was implied clearly enough. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 6:03 pm
Here is a guest post in my Bush v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:51 am
The case of Carmer v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:17 pm
The front page of the New York Times (May 31, 2011) contains a great story by Peter Lattman, quoting me, on the pending case of Simkin v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 7:35 am
Even though SCOTUSblog will competently cover Snyder v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 10:04 pm
Woolums v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:46 am
In CODE REVISION COMMISSION and State of Georgia v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:24 am
District Court for the Western District of Washington approved a settlement agreement today in Favela Avendaño v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:00 pm
Since the Supreme Court recognized marriage equality in Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 5:03 am
I achieved another big win for a client in Queens! [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 6:01 pm
Judge Ricciardulli gets an A+ for this opinion published today.If one of my students wrote this in response to a final examination hypothetical, I'd find it to be absolutely perfect. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:06 pm
Two questions about this opinion:(1) What's the relevant standard of proof? [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:08 pm
One thing about looking at a business from outside is that you're never sure if your perceptions are based on erroneous information. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:01 pm
I know that some of our youngest readers are starting to study for the bar exam this week.Maybe this will help.It's a good review of the elements of solicitation and attempt; in particular, as applied to attempted murder. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am
Diaz v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am
Diaz v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am
Diaz v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:43 pm
Kent discusses Hall v. [read post]
