Search for: "People v. Davis"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
As noted in the New York Times’ editorial, Justice Anthony Kennedy seized the opportunity to write a concurring opinion in Davis v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am
That future development came in a pair of domestic violence cases decided the same day, Davis v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 2:40 pm
--in the context of the Confrontation Clause, a fact "potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution," Davis v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
People v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, and Davis v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
A law violating a constitution established by the people themselves, would be considered by the Judges as null & void. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 297 N.W.2d 252, 258 (Minn. 1980); Dadd v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:12 am
First, County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
” Tracomin SA v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:56 am
A pair of companion cases (found at Davis v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:01 pm
The first is a case that considers the extent to which the First Amendment protects against prosecution individuals who utter words that cause objectively reasonable people to feel fear (Elonis v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:49 pm
We have previously noted that when a statute imposes criminal liability for knowingly disregarding a risk, it does not require a particular outcome or actions aimed at a specific individual; the crime is solely defined by the risk of injury produced by defendant's conduct (see, People v Davis, 72 NY2d 32, 36-37). [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:12 pm
As outlined in People v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am
” Justice Garland recalled the Court’s precedent in “NBC v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 6:25 am
Davis. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
But in 1997, in City of Boerne v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:40 pm
Although the court believed people in Florida have no expectation of privacy in cell phone location information, the Florida Supreme Court reached the opposite conclusion last year in Tracey v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:09 pm
It's not like people actually read those dense notices and say "What?! [read post]
