Search for: "People v. House"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 12,995
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2012, 2:59 pm
More on the new JOBS Act passed yesterday by the US House. 1. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
It's not like an "oath" is really going to change people's behavior, or "screen out" bad people. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:14 pm
Supreme Court last week, Bailey v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
That amendment states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
In Urso v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:09 am
In Matter of Sullivan v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:45 am
California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:35 am
The post State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
My main interest in the case is how it will compare to Abigail Alliance v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
This case drew a lot of attention from people who care about U.S. foreign relations law because Bond’s second argument asked the Court to overrule Missouri v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:37 am
" Moore v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:16 pm
In April 2007, the Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
Thus, Gravano's and Lohan's claims that Take-Two impermissibly used their likeness in Grand Theft Auto V, or in material promoting Grand Theft Auto V, must fail. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:46 am
In Powell v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:09 pm
In the recent case Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:04 am
The 4th Amendment to the United State's Constitution says "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated... [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 8:51 am
In People v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm
People disagreed with me then, and now. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:44 am
The continuing resolution passed both houses with this provision in it; the President could in theory refuse to sign it. [read post]
