Search for: "People v. Sample"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,949
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2007, 9:31 am
" Put another way, people's preconceived notions about whether the Court is a politically-oriented entity or whether it is "above politics" impact the responses that people have to the ads. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 8:52 am
This can prove more challenging than many people believe. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
Helping smart people start new companies should, in fact, help the global economy. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:25 am
Session 1, Copyright Jim Gibson [with Chris Cotropia]: Random sample of copyright cases filed 20080-2011, coded 957 cases for parties, claims, remedies requested, final adjudication. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:46 am
People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:48 am
It’s what called sample selection bias: people draw conclusions from a non-representative sample of data. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
Powell v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 11:33 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 9:16 am
Philips v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:08 am
PSEG Long Island LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm
McNeal’s habeas petition, finding that the motion to compel a DNA sample from Mr. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:06 am
Parks, LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:46 am
Interestingly, the results were the opposite of those expected, but this may be down to the small sample size and slightly rushed nature of the exercise. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
In Cruz v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 3:38 pm
A. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 1:56 pm
The judge held that these samples demonstrated that there really was a serious problem in the building in relation to the sound insulation. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
The testing only required providing a urine sample, and it only revealed the presence of certain illegal drugs. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:37 am
” We were not able to DM 28 people (34 percent of our sample); we followed them temporarily — which made for two days of dreadful Twitter — but they never followed us back. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:44 am
” D’Amico v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:43 pm
Supreme Court decision, Birchfield v. [read post]