Search for: "Precision Contracting, Inc."
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2009, 12:44 pm
Allied Assocs., Inc., 477 So. 2d 656, 657 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), the court noted: The trial court enjoined Angelino from competing against Starbridge Networks. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:53 pm
On January 8, 2009, the Supreme Court of California issued a unanimous decision in Prospect Medical Group Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:22 pm
MapQuest, Inc. v.CIVIX-DDI, LLC, 2009 WL 383476 (N.D. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
Owners Ass'n, Inc., 317 S.C. 200, 452 S.E.2d619 (Ct. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
This post is by my colleagues Gail Lees, Andrew Tulumello, Chip Nierlich, Mark Whitburn and Chris Chorba. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Techdirt) Thomas Edison and National Inventors’ Day (Securing Innovation) (Patent Baristas) US General – Decisions Los Angeles Superior Court jury finds founders of Blueprint Test Preparation breached non-compete contract with Robin Singh Educational Services (Law360) US Patent Reform Patent reform 2009 (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Intellectual Property Watch) Manufacturing Alliance sends letter on patent reform to… [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:02 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
The arbitrator should determine if the issue raised in a demand for arbitration is subject to arbitration under the terms of the bargaining agreementMatter of Town of Cheektowaga v Cheektowaga Police Club, Inc., 2009 NY Slip Op 00842, Decided on February 6, 2009, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentThe Cheektowaga Police Club, representing police officers below the rank of lieutenant, filed a demand for arbitration to challenge Cheektowaga's decision to promote one officer to the rank… [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 4:54 am
Co., 259 AD2d 957, 958; see Precision Auto Accessories, Inc., 52 AD3d at 1200; Curanovic, 307 AD2d at 437; see also § 3105 [c]). [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 5:55 pm
., Inc., 2009 WL 175036 (N.Y. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 12:53 am
This post is about a recent federal case that addressed this precise issue.It's a civil case: Condux International, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 12:30 pm
Eurodif, S.A. et al, together with No. 07-1078, USEC Inc. et al. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 11:34 am
The case, which handed a win to CITGO allowing it to charge higher prices than those urged by The Pantry, is The Pantry, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:54 pm
The emphasis should be put on "precisely". [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Anastasios Manitaras held either a 49.74% or 49.89% membership interest (the parties disagreed as to the precise figure) and a group of seven individuals collectively held the remaining majority interest. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 5:28 pm
And the waiver has to be precise in order to be effective. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 1:15 pm
Board of Trade of the City of New York, Inc., Del. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
(United Systems of Arkansas, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
” Strine concludes with the 1985 case arising from Ronald Perelman’s hostile bid for Revlon Inc., whose French CEO, Michel Bergerac, Strine says, had “a strong personal antipathy” for his antagonist, “some Jewish guy from Philadelphia. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:43 am
The complaint asserted a breach of contract cause of action. [read post]
