Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 1,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm
Justice McCallum of the NSW Supreme Court went so far as to say that the defence’s application had departed from the intended purpose of the law. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:03 am
By Daniel RichardsonState v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 9:19 am
Murthy v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:56 am
I thought about that project, and the “be careful of what you wish for” principle, when I read Chief Justice Roberts’s dissent in Miller v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
KomosinskiDesignee of Department Children and Families: Erin O’Leary, Esq.For purposes of convenience and operational consistency, the Commission has been formallyplaced in, but not of, the Department of Law & Public Safety. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am
And McGahn, though he was a private citizen at that time, complied with Trump’s direction. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:26 am
In the Bell case, the Justice Department got such an injunction against Marston's mentor, Thurston Bell, and the DOJ seems to have done the same with a number of others who had operated such sties. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
Earlier in the year, a district court upheld a plea agreement’s FOIA waiver, noting that plaintiff failed to identify any public policy harms that would override criminal justice interests favoring enforcement of plaintiff’s voluntary waiver. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 10:49 am
From People v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am
The division came about since Justice Elena Kagan was recused from the case – Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:41 pm
Justice Robert H. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm
See Justice Scalia's lone dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
Late last year, he issued an executive order (and the Department of Justice issued accompanying regulations) intended to implement his commitment. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
Stickman IV's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:25 am
Yet none but a clairvoyant could have predicted the aftermath on June 15, 1982 when the Supreme Court in Plyler v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:19 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The decision came Wednesday, in Suradi v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts’s opinion for six justices in Harvard and five justices in UNC is not crystal clear, but a holding can be gleaned from the following. [read post]
