Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 4,475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
The Plaintiffs' action was dismissed as a result.Read the decision at: Stewart Estate v TAQA North Ltd. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 11:00 pm
”They certainly didn’t have his back there.# # #DECISIONE.E. v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 5:00 am
And because no evidence was provided showing the separation of the structures before 2017, the owner thus failed to evince the buildings were “not part of a horizontal multiple dwelling at any time” prior thereto; with the operative look-back date being as early as January 1, 1974.Given that gap in proof, the AT2 vacated the underlying judgments and dismissed the case.That was some horizontal dance ….# # #DECISIONO. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
# # #DECISIONS. v 24 Hour Fitness [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONC. v I.https://nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2024/2024_03812.htm [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONCaesar v Metropolitan Transp. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:37 am
In a Saskatchewan case decided last fall, the Court of Queen's Bench ruled that the tenant under a gravel extraction lease was not subject to termination of the lease for having missed a deadline to provide proof of insurance coverage. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:29 pm
People v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:47 am
Taking these two positions as starting points, the paper identifies how courts produce spatial justice, drawing on a case study, the decision by the European Court of Human Rights, Rael v Switzerland (2012). [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:07 pm
Choy, People v Hawkins and People v White. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
The Nevada case is Nevada v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 5:10 am
In Coleman v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:47 am
In Hammond v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:24 am
The trial judge denied plaintiff’s motion to increase the award and in Mehmeti v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 2:45 pm
The decision in Zwack v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 3:11 pm
Company-A was the owner of a certain property in Queens County, which it bought to develop into a 12-story commercial building, with retail spaces, office condominiums, entertainment complexes and parking. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:45 am
In Pinder v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:27 pm
Under facts substantially similar to the Lewis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm
The Queen on the Application of Janet Harris (Appellant) v London Borough of Haringey (Respondent) and Grainger Seven Sisters Ltd (2) Northumberland And Durham Property Trust Ltd (Interested Parties) and The Equality and Human Rights Commission (Intervener) [2010] EWCA Civ 703 22 June 2010 – read judgment In granting planning permission for redevelopment of a site in an area made up predominantly of ethnic minority communities, a local authority had failed to discharge… [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:52 pm
People v. [read post]
