Search for: "Quick v. United States"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2023, 12:22 am
According to the CDC, it is estimated that 1.4 million cases of salmonellosis occur each year in the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:15 am
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an opinion in Glik v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 12:38 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:02 am
” Sigalas v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 2:34 pm
Pajares v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:16 pm
" On appeal, the United States Supreme Court held that the Arizona Supreme Court was wrong about Lynch, which did cause a "significant change" in the law. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:24 am
" Spangler v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:18 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:58 am
For the fourth time in six years (minus a few months), Apple and Samsung will square off again, starting today, in the San Jose building of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 8:52 am
Fontes, 111 F.4th 976, 980 n.1 (9th Cir. 2024) (quoting United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 4:51 am
Holder, to use the occasion “as an opportunity to affirm our nation’s commitment to the promises of equality and voting rights as guaranteed by the words of the United States Constitution. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:00 pm
United States, 503 U.S. 540, 549 (1992), holds that entrapment must be decided by the factfinder under the usual "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, and therefore, arguably not in a pre-trial motion. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am
It’s a fun and quick read. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm
When the HHS Secretary has declared a public health emergency and the President of the United States has declared a disaster or emergency under the Stafford Act or National Emergencies Act, the HHS Secretary is authorized to grant certain waivers or modifications in order to address the outbreak (referred to as a Section 1135 Waiver). [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 6:11 am
All the way up to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:11 am
” (Here, on the defendant’s dime).United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:15 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, about whether that agency’s administrative law judges are “officers” of the United States under the Constitution’s appointments clause. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:19 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 8:56 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
In Kalina v. [read post]
