Search for: "ROYAL V. STATE" Results 1101 - 1120 of 2,233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
In Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA, [2014] EUECJ C-98/13 (06 February 2014), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held that a pirated good is distributed in a member State when it is purchased online from a non-member State and shipped from another non-member State into a member State. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Carlyle, heard 20 November 2014. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:52 am by Peter Hunt
The recent United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit opinion in Franza v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:54 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Carlyle, heard 20 November 2014. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am by Ron Coleman
  And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:52 am by Peter Hunt
With the recent United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit decision in Franza v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
The legislature (the Chief Pleas) generally legislates by Laws, which are passed as a Projet de Loi and then receive Royal Assent. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Carlyle, heard 20 November 2014. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:15 am by Isobel Williams
In The Queen’s Jewels, Leslie Field describes the funeral cortège of King George V: the Maltese cross on top of the Imperial State Crown, placed on the coffin, fell to the pavement and was retrieved by a Grenadier Guard. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:38 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
These arguments were rejected by Vos J who stated that the Prince should not receive special treatment in English litigation, and the order stood. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:48 am
If it stands, several libraries would close their doors just as much as the internet service providers would if they are responsible for privacies diminished by others agency – comparison borrowed by the Argentinian Court from England’s Royal Court of Justice, in case Metropolitan International Schools Ltd v. [read post]