Search for: "Range v. Attorney General United States" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm by Greg Mersol
  Those same difficulties ultimately proved to be the unraveling of a class challenging the method by which chaplains were selected by the United States Navy. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] If SEC or other proposed federal regulation of cybersecurity becomes a reality, implementing the Framework could be a mandatory exercise. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The General Counsel to the United States Catholic Conference at the time, Mark Chopko, testified before the House Committee on the Judiciary a year before RFRA was first enacted in 1993 that the bishops were concerned that RFRA might “be used to promote access to abortion. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
The general counsel or claim manager needs to accurately estimate a range that will be on his or her check, before he goes to his superiors for settlement authority. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:53 am
If the stingray is within the cell phone's signal range, [it] measures signals from the phone, and based on the cell phone's signal strength, . . . can provide an initial general location of the phone. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Since 2003, a third of the net new jobs created in the United States were in Texas. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm by Jodie Liu
Second, the section would eliminate the Attorney General and FBI’s ability to issue a certification—which is treated as conclusive by a judge considering a petition to modify or set aside a nondisclosure order—that disclosure may endanger the national security of the United States or interfere with diplomatic relations. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:05 pm by Bart Torvik
The Solicitor General wrote the court to inform it that the previous brief had been submitted on behalf of the United States, and that no agency-specific briefs would be forthcoming. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Smith vividly depicts the unfolding drama as Attorney General Robert F. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
 I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 4:27 am by SHG
United States, unpublished Sixth Circuit decision regarding prejudice under the Lafler and Frye decisions, that made it onto Doug Berman’s radar at Sentencing Law & Policy. [read post]