Search for: "Roman v. Roman"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 2,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2014, 4:05 am
The Baton Rouge (LA) Advocate reported yesterday on the Louisiana Supreme Court's per curiam opinion and a concurrence in Parents of Minor Child v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:35 am
The Supreme Court ruled in 1965, in Griswold v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:21 am
This was the first court filing by the federal government in the wake of Monday’s ruling in Burwell v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 8:38 am
This was the first court filing by the federal government in the wake of Monday’s ruling in Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
[No]Section 2(e)(2) - Primarily Geographically Descriptive:Precedential No. 22: TTAB Affirms Geographical Descriptiveness Refusal of HOLLYWOOD LAWYERS ONLINE for Online Referral ServicesSection 2(e)(3) - Primarily Geographically Deceptively Misdescriptive:TTAB Affirms Section 2(e)(3) Refusal of KUBA KUBA BY DREW ESTATE for CigarsSection 2(e)(4) - Primarily Merely a Surname:TTAB Reverses Section 2(e)(4) Surname Refusal of ROMANÓV for Decorative EggsSection 2(f) - Acquired… [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:09 am
(Horace was the ancient Roman we met in our first fraudulent transfer post.) [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
Collins on Richard Posner and NAACP v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 10:55 am
Criminal conversation, like the Holy Roman Empire, is neither. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:25 am
Roman Hoyos Law and conquest are deeply intertwined phenomena. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:30 am
Simply put, the term ROMANÓV has significance apart from a surname as the designation of the Russian imperial dynasty. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:05 am
In Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 3:30 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:36 am
An earlier criminal excursion into the same dispute is at R. v. de Vos; R. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:37 pm
In the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:16 pm
” A Recent Example: Roman v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:14 am
This is the very issue that came up in Wednesday’s federal trial court decision in Degroat v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 8:06 am
In Overall v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 5:29 am
Today’s case of the day is- No. 05-13-00130-CR ROMAN JESSE MENDOZA, Appellant V. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:20 am
In People v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 11:38 am
Cette activité interprétative était ‘révélatrice’ d’un corpus de valeurs métaphysiques à laquelle seule la Scientia Juris des magistrats pouvait puiser. [read post]
